02-19-2013, 07:59 PM #27
- 721 Posts
Here's what I don't understand: if I buy the phone subsidized by signing a contract, the carrier will get their money back either by me paying them for service for 2 years or by charging me an ETF if I leave early. I realize that they don't want me going to another carrier even if they get reimbursed for the phone, but competition is part of the free market. I also realize that initially the phone is not mine, but after I pay for 2 years of service or pay the ETF plus whatever other fees they might charge me, it's mine. Once I sign on the dotted line, I will be paying for that phone one way or another. I guess I fail to see how someone can even screw the carrier, phone locked or unlocked.
02-19-2013, 08:33 PM #28
- 1,442 Posts
So basically they're protecting the carriers and not us. Useless government.
This is misuse of the DMCA. The DMCA was created to protect creative works, not to protect wireless carriers' business.Phone History (hopefully in order): Samsung SGH-D407 > AT&T (HTC) Tilt > Sony Ericsson W580 > Blackberry Curve 8900 > Sony Ericsson C901 > HTC Touch Pro 2 > Blackberry 9700 > iPhone 3GS > Motorola Defy > Blackberry 9650 > iPhone 4 > Nokia E71 > Dell Venue Pro > HTC Titan > HTC Titan II > Lumia 900 + Samsung Galaxy Exhibit > Nokia Lumia 920 + Nokia Lumia 521 + Motorola RAZR V3xx
Last updated: 05/13/2013
02-20-2013, 04:37 PM #29
- 990 Posts
Using a loss leader is always risky business, no matter what product you're selling. Why should the government be propping up risky business practices?
But the reality is that logic has no place here. It all boils down to companies using lobbying money to buy the privilege to write their own legislation.
02-28-2013, 04:00 AM #31
- 16 Posts
A White House petition to make unlocking cell phones legal again has passed 1 lakh signature . Passing the milestone means the U.S. government has to issue an official response. On January 26th, unlocking a cell phone that is under contract became illegal in the U.S Just before that went into effect , a petition was started at whitehouse.gov https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/pet...legal/1g9KhZG7 to have the Librarian of Congress revisit that decision. 'It reduces consumer choice, and decreases the resale value of devices that consumers have paid for in full. The Librarian noted that carriers are offering more unlocked phones at present, but the great majority of phones sold are still locked,this can be done using any third party vendors .i have come across a site called Unlock-free.com ... where unlock codes can be obtained for free for most of the basic models but this is not applicable for smart phones .The policy is a big issue for anyone who wants to use their phone abroad, without needing to go through their U.S.' carrier's expensive roaming and international plans. Additionally, anyone who wants to move to a new GSM carrier in the U.S. (such as T-Mobile to AT&T), will have issues. any how lets wait for a positive response from the government..
Last edited by palandri; 02-28-2013 at 08:54 AM.
- By LumiaDream in forum Nokia Lumia 920Replies: 254Last Post: 10-28-2013, 09:41 AM
- By infamousdaveman in forum HTC 8XReplies: 32Last Post: 10-07-2012, 04:52 PM
- By bw789 in forum Windows Phone 7Replies: 10Last Post: 09-07-2012, 04:04 PM
- By CaliforniaMan in forum Windows Phone 7Replies: 30Last Post: 06-11-2012, 11:29 PM
- By 12Danny123 in forum Upcoming & Rumored DevicesReplies: 20Last Post: 05-06-2012, 08:47 PM